Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

Friday, February 12, 2010

Review: Bome Midi Translator Pro 1.7.1

What is Bome's MIDI Translator? In simple terms, it can be compared to a language translator for MIDI messages. You may only understand English, but your peer can only speak German. You need someone who can translate from German to English and English to German. Bome's MIDI Translator is language independant of course. Instead, it is software produced by Bome to translate to and from MIDI protocol.

The software works with one or more input devices and one or more output devices. Each device can be a hardware device (such as a USB controller or keyboard) or virtual software, such as a program you're using. Essentially, the MIDI Translator can be programmed to intercept messages and take many different actions with them before sending them through to the output device.

The translator can edit the bytes in the MIDI message, completely block the MIDI message, route the message through without any editing, turn the MIDI message into text, or send numerous other commands to your output device.

Bome's Midi Translator can translate high resolution MIDI data into more commonly supported lower resolution data, as seen in DJ Tech Tools Mini Translator. Bome's MT can also create multiple modes of operation, utilizing as many "Shift" modifiers as you have buttons. Stanton's DaRouter demonstrates this well with their SCS.3 System.

Bome's does not replace midi mapping, but it instead acts like a modifier that intercepts the data between your MIDI controller and your MIDI Map in the software. It gives the user full control of their MIDI device's inputs and outputs. Unfortunately, the translator cannot give MIDI functionality to buttons that do not output a signal.

The software is well-designed and simple to use after reading some short tutorials on Bome's website. It does have a MIDI Learn function. However, that does not mean MIDI translating is a simple process. Each project is different since each MIDI message is different. Creating your own MIDI Translator project is like custom programming your own software. You tell it what to do or it doesn't work. Each project is as simple or as complicated as you make it. There are a lot of available rules, translations, and outputs. Intend on investing quite a bit of time in learning how to program your MIDI devices with MIDI Translator. Once you do have a functioning translator project, you'll be amazed at what you can do.. and you'll be wishing you had more hands to operate your devices!

If you are wanting more out of your MIDI devices than what your current software and hardware can provide, I highly recommend Bome's Midi Translator Pro. I must admit that the price tag is a bit stiff for what it is, but it may just be worth it for the mostly bug-free, simple interface.

Download the demo (which has an incredibly annoying 20-minute time limit) to get a better idea of its functionality. I also recommend downloading Bome's SysSX, which displays all connected incoming and outgoing MIDI data. This is great for testing your translator project files.

If you are pretty happy with your current MIDI functionality, this software is probably not worth the trouble to you. I cannot stress enough that it is not for people who want to pick-up and play. It is definitely out there for the people who want ultimate MIDI customization. Keep in mind that this is in ADDITION to your MIDI maps; it does not replace MIDI mapping.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Review: Akai MDP24 (MDP26) Pad Control

I didn't plan on getting a new pad control anytime soon, but I found a used version of the exact model that I wanted at a really good price. So of course, I couldn't pass it up! The Akai MDP24 (pictured here) has been discontinued, and its replacement is the MDP26. The MDP26 is essentially the same thing, except it has a black cover, 6 knobs instead of 8, a key note button, a swing button, and a tap tempo button. Aside from that, they are practically identical. The MDP26 sacrifices 2 knobs in exchange for a tap tempo (for setting BPM) and note repeat (with swing to adjust how often the note repeats). Note repeat is useful for emulating drum rolls and such.

Having said that, I purchased the MDP24 because the difference wasn't that important to me. The unit is very solid and feels like it was built with quality. The pads are a little squishier on the corners because they don't directly touch the sensor pads there. This can be considered a good or bad thing, depending on how you look at it.

There are over 30 customizable presets that can be named and controlled directly from the LCD screen. Each preset allows you to name it and change the parameters of each pad, fader, and knob. Pads can be used to toggle on/off mode, press/hold mode, and program-change mode (for changing instruments and such). Knobs and faders can have their minimum and maximum values setup independantly. Every pad, knob, and fader is capable of sending 0 to 127 bits of MIDI information, based on the amount the knob/fader is adjusted or how hard the pad is pressed.

The pads are not too squishy, but not resistant and hard either. They provided a nice rubber bounce to them when hit, and they are pressure-sensitive for sending lower/higher velocity (volume) messages. Each pad can be customized to signal certain notes (4 banks of 16, so a total of 64 notes). You can also assign aftertouch values to each pad, allowing the after-effect of holding down the button to be different from the initial effect of pressing the button.

The faders and knobs are both very responsive. Aftertouch can be setup with each of these also. The controller can also send play/stop/record/FF/RW messages to hardware that recognizes Midi-Machine Code.

One of my favorite features about this controller is that it is software-independant. It is truely plug-n-play compatible. The software is there if you want to use the included samples and VST plugin, or if you want to edit your presets via PC instead of the controller's LCD display. Other than that, the software is mainly used for updating firmware to the device. So any patches and changes made to how the controller works is downloaded from the computer and permanently stored in the device itself. What's so great about this? You can take this controller and plug it into any computer that recognizes USB 2.0 and Midi messages. No need for drivers! So there is no waiting around for drivers when the next version of Windows comes out.

Overall, great product! My only complaint is that the USB cord is way too short (about 3 feet long), but it can be replaced with a cheap A/B USB cable.

Review: Cables Unlimited USB-1870 USB 2.0 Hub

So what's so different about USB hubs anyway? They just split a USB connection into several other USB connections, right? Well, yes and no. Unfortunately, many USB hub designs lack proper power distribution, switching between USB 1.1 and 2.0, and a few other overlooked features. I am reviewing what I consider to be a very special USB hub.

USB 1.1 or USB 2.0?
Cables Unlimited USB-1870 is a HI-SPEED USB 2.0 hub (backwards compatible with 1.1 also) with multiple transaction translators, i.e. multi-TT. The transaction translator translates data from each of the ports on the USB hub to the computer's USB port. If you are using a USB 1.1 device, then the TT will send data at speeds up to 12 Mbps from the device to the PC. If you are using a USB 2.0 device, the TT can transmit up to 480 Mbps between the device and PC.

Most USB Hubs are 1.1 and 2.0 compatible.. but not at the same time. In other words, if you have a USB 1.1 device and a USB 2.0 device connected to a single TT hub, your USB 2.0 device will only run as fast as 12 Mbps. This is something that most USB Hubs fail to mention. Instead they tell you to try not to connect USB 1.1 and USB 2.0 together. Who wants to worry about that? I certainly don't. With Cables Unlimited's multi-TT hub, each device can run at it's designated speed. There is a TT for each port, so USB 2.0 devices won't have to slow down USB 1.1 devices. Of course, if you have two very busy hard drives writing at the same time, you're going to have some slow down, since you are sharing one port on the computer. However, most other devices do not transmit that much data.

Powered Hub
It includes a power adapter that is capable of supplying power to 5-6 of the 7 ports at the same time. Most devices don't use the full power of a single port anyway, aside from hard drives and such. Most competitor ports supply half the power as this one, where only 3 of 7 ports have full power. If you require all 7 ports have power, you'll just have to find a higher current AC to DC power adapter.

Most hubs don't have power switches, and the PC's USB ports continue to supply power to USB devices even while the PC is off (since the computer's internal power supply is still on and supplying the motherboard with juice). Some hubs continue to supply power to devices once the PC is shut down also. Once you shut down the PC and unplug the included power adapter, all the attached devices turn off.

I honestly don't recall whether or not this USB hub functions as an unpowered hub or not. One of the primary motives for this hub is the power adapter. If you want convenience, you probably want an unpowered 4 port hub. If you want a hub that can provide maximum support for your devices, you want the Cables Unlimited USB-1870.

Physical Design
There are a lot of complaints on USB hubs because cords are managed poorly or the hub slides around too easily. This hub has soft footpads and just enough weight to stay in place. Of course it's not going to stay in places if you're jerking the wires around, but it won't move just because a cord is coiled up poorly. The hub is very compact, not wasting any space at all. 7 ports all come out one side, and the connections to the computer and power adapter are on the other side.

It has a red LED to show the hub has power, and the hub has a green LED for each port to show that those ports have power also.

Best of all: It's around $20 and it works!

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Review: Pioneer HDJ-2000 Headphones

After careful comparison of headphones in the $200 range, I went with the Pioneer HDJ-2000 because I found a good deal on them. Most headphones in the $200 range are "durable plastic" with great sound quality and a few other perks (replaceable parts, etc.). The big attraction to these is the metal construction. Due to the noticeably rugged exterior of these, I would buy these again for $350. Every headphone has its flaws, including this one.

Since there aren't too many unbiased reviews on this headphone right now, I'll try to be as unbiased as possible with this review. I'll start with its design flaws first:

The mini-XLR cable has a very solid connection, perhaps a little too solid. Its connection to the headphone is quite difficult to remove. It's stuck on there pretty tight! I pushed the unlocking button in while tugging on it several times before it finally came undone. The plastic unlocking button on this mini-XLR plug doesn't seem like it could handle a whole lot of abuse. I don't plan to remove it again unless I need to replace the cable. The headphones can be folded while leaving the cord in, so there is no reason to unplug it regularly anyway. You're just going to wear it out.

The slider is made of plastic, which may not be a flaw at all. The slider feels just as solid as Ultrasone's plastic slider. The reason I listed it as a flaw is that some headphones have been reported to crack here, such as the Denon DN-HP1000. This one seems very unlikely to crack, since it is much more rugged than the Denon. Pioneer also said that their headband is reinforced with metal, so metal may be in the slider.

The earcups don't swivel 180 degrees, just 90 degrees. This is not necessarily a flaw, but it would be nice to have for more flexibility. I don't have any use for the extra 90 degrees of rotation, so it is not a big deal to me.

It does not offer anything competitive with Ultrasone's S-Logic technology. No surround sound, no hearing protection outside of standard isolation, and no protection from electromagnetic radiation. Even though the pioneer does not offer anything like this, their isolation is noticeably better than the Ultrasone DJ1 headphones.. so it makes up in the hearing protection area. So really you're just losing out on the EM radiation protection and the surround sound. I don't think headphones output high enough frequencies to worry about EM radiation though.

Honestly, nothing bothers me about the headphone; I just had to be a critic for the sake of an unbiased review. I love this headphone more than anything else on the market! A list of the pros:

The sound quality is amazing - the only competitor here is the Ultrasone DJ1 in my opinion. The bass and high frequencies stand out a little bit more than the mids, but not by much. The highs are not irritating at all - they sound quite pleasant, and the bass is punchy. The mids sound really good, but the Ultrasones mids are a little bit better. The bass is better in these than the Ultrasones, and the highs are about the same in each. The Xone 53 and Denon DN-HP1000 come nowhere close to this kind of sound in any aspect - they are just loud and fairly clear. The Pioneers are just as loud as the Xone 53 and Denon DN-HP1000, but the HDJ-2000s have much higher isolation.

The isolation on these is ideal to me. They are not like earpads for the firing range, aka Sennheiser HD 280s, but that is too much for me. You can have a conversation with the music playing without taking these off, but you can just as easily ignore sounds outside of the earcups. There is only a slight echo when tapping the headphones. When wearing these on both ears, I have to turn the volume DOWN to mix with music outside the speakers. The isolation is better than the Ultrasone DJ1s and a little better than the Xone 53s.

The headphones can go very loud also. I held them at an arms distance at max volume with my cell phone connected, and I could hear them as clearly as computer desktop speakers. You could certainly damage your hearing if you played these at full volume all the time. I keep them down as low as I can while still hearing the music. Since the isolation has a nice balance, you can always wear both earpads and listen to the music through them. This method works out very well, and I have to turn the volume down very low inside the headphones.. so it saves your hearing a lot!

The coiled cable is very solid and has a good amount of flex to it. It is not too springy, but it is springier than a telephone cable. The included bag is ok. The coiled cable and earcups are both replaceable. The cable is around $30 to replace, and the earcups are around $50 due to their more rugged synthetic leather design. The earcups feel much more like leather than any other headphone I've used. They are very soft and cool on the ear. If the room is warm, your ears will get quite warm still. The memory foam is amazingly comfortable! Imagine a light weight memory-foam pillow ring around your ear. The earcups gently rest around your earlobe. Very comfortable, and I've had no problems with anything but the earcup touching my ear (i.e. no metal or speaker hitting it).

When you flip the earcups, they gently lock into place, and they can easily be unlocked just by flipping them back. After the earcups swivel 90 degrees, they gently swivel back. It is not a whipping motion; it's very gentle. The wide, metal construction around the joints is extremely well built, lightweight, and comfortable. The headphones gently rest on your ears without much pressure. Honestly, I can barely tell they are there, aside from feeling those warm comfortable earpads. They simply fit like a comfortable pair of earmuffs.

The headband is very rugged, although it appears to be a plastic/rubber with metal reinforcement. I had my doubts about this part of the headphone at first, but it does its job very well. It is very flexible and sturdy at the same time. The padding under the headband is just enough. i don't really notice the headband being on my head at all.

I've worn these headphones for 2 hours with no discomfort whatsoever. When the room is fairly cool, my ears stay at a reasonable temperature. When the room is fairly warm, my ears start to get warm due to the enclosure. Overall, I haven't found a more comfortable pair of full-enclosure headphones.

The mono/stereo switch is a nice addition that keeps me from having to change my settings in DJ software. The mono obviously doesn't sound as high quality as the stereo, since everything is mashed into one channel, but it is the best sounding mono I've ever heard. It is definitely good enough for mixing. Both earcups output the same mono signal, so you can listen with either ear.

The flexibility of these headphones is very nice. You can easily wear them around your neck and quickly lift them to one ear to listen. They fold up very nicely, although it takes another couple seconds to do so. The earcups are big and fit in a small space when the headphones fold, so it takes a second to fold them right. Not a problem though.

The headphones look HUGE in pictures, but they are surprisingly small. The earcups are the only thing big on these headphones. The earcups are circular and are just big enough to cover your full ear. I'd say the Xone 53 earcups are a little bigger. The headband is fairly thin in comparison, about an inch wide.

Overall, I'd give them a 9.5 out of 10 because everything has room to improve. The other headphones I've tested would be a 9.0 (ultrasone), and the rest would be 8.0 and below. Haven't tried Sennheiser HD 25 1-II's because I don't like the build, sorry Senn fans. If you want a smaller headphone, consider the Sennheiser. If you want a full-coverage can that will last, go with the HDJ-2000.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Hooked on Headphonics

I feel hooked on headphonics right now; I'm having such a hard time deciding which new headphones to buy. I've been to the store to try them on several times now, and by the time I narrow it down, I find more headphones that I like. At the time of this post, these headphones are in the $200 price range on the internet. I am taking the following factors into account:

  • Durable: I don't want to break them under normal use.
  • Comfortable: Minimum pain after several hours of use.
  • Sound quality: Crisp, clear sound separation of Highs, Mids, and Lows.
  • Hearing Protection: Isolation from outside noise.

Pioneer HDJ-2000

I unfortunately haven't tried these on yet. The Pioneer HDJ-2000 is commonly regarded as the most durable DJ headphones on the market, since much of its construction is made of metal and the cord/earpads are both replaceable. They supposably have very good sound quality, but not the absolute best. They apparently provide good isolation and are very comfortable, due to the leather and memory foam. These also have a mono/stereo switch. I hope they are more than just hype. The hearing protection & comfort are my main concerns with this pair.


Ultrasone DJ1

I have tried on the Ultrasone DJ1, and they feel and sound absolutely amazing! They don't put much pressure on your ears, and they really produce surround sound, which helps the sound clarity and quality. They are targeted to protect your hearing by not requiring as much volume. They are all plastic, so I have my doubts on durability. The cord is also not replaceable, and I am unsure of the earpads. However, I have not seen a viable complaint of quality from any users, and many people have owned these for 2-3 years without any problems at all. The plastic material & lack of replaceable parts is my main concern with this model.



Ultrasone DJ1 Pro

I have not tried these on, but they have rave reviews. The DJ1 Pro is extremely similar to the DJ1, with the exception of a few technical specs. Overall, I've heard that this model is more "pro" with finer tuning, a hard case, replaceable earpads, and replaceable cord. The durability is the same, the hearing protection is the same, the sound quality is very similar, and the comfort is similar. Supposably your hearing is as good right after a gig as it is beforehand when using these cans. My main concern is the size of the earpads - they are a wider, circular shape instead of the DJ1's thinner oval shape. They might get hot or slide around on my head.



Allen & Heath Xone XD 53

I have tried this on, and they were comfortable, but not quite as comfortable as the Ultrasones. They are very durable, and I have yet to see a problem with these breaking. These are plastic with metal reinforcement inside. The sound quality in these were very good, but very loud. The isolation was good, and the headphones were comfortable at first. I have read where they begin to hurt after an hour or so. The sound volume began to hurt my ears after a few minutes. My main concerns with these are the comfort, the cord is not replaceable, and hearing protection. Please note that these are very similar to the Denon DN-HP1000 in structure and particularly sound. However, the Denon's lack the metal reinforcement, and Denons have more swivel. I would be glad to hear any comments or experience you've had with any of these headphones. I am leaning away from the Xone 53.